Improving INL
Wind Forecasting with Cluster Analysis of Wind Patterns
Background
NOAA ARL-FRD has provided INL Site climatology monitoring and
specialized weather forecasting such as wind forecasts for
nearly 60 years. Understanding wind patterns and forecasting
winds are of interest at the INL Site for various applications.
Short-term wind forecasts are used during emergency operations
to track the potential transport of hazardous substances and in
predicting the spread of wildfires. Wind forecasts are also
important for the safety of personnel and the effi ciency of many
routine INL Site activities. For example, some operations at the
INL Site can only be conducted when the wind speed remains under
specific thresholds. Climatological wind patterns are also one
factor that must be considered as part of INL Site’s efforts to
ensure it meets regulatory requirements for public safety.
The meteorologists working at NOAA ARL-FRD have long known
that a few typical wind patterns recur frequently across the INL
Site and the surrounding area. For example, meteorologists have
learned to expect northeast, down-valley winds on summer
mornings and up-valley, southwesterly flows on summer afternoons.
Cluster analysis is one mathematical approach used to identify
common patterns in data. A cluster analysis of the NOAA INL Site
Mesonet wind observations was completed to better understand the
frequent wind patterns and to exploit them in weather
forecasting.
This analysis identified eight clusters or typical wind
patterns which seem to be well correlated to commonly observed
meteorological conditions.
Objectives
The main objective of this project is to formally identify
recurring wind patterns and create a method to categorize wind fields
according to these patterns. Three goals of the project once
these clusters are defined are to:
Understand how the wind fields evolve over time and
obtain a better understanding of the physical processes
driving the wind fields.
Improve wind forecasting, both short and long term at
the INL Site.
Investigate whether the wind patterns are correlated
with other factors such as precipitation coverage and
wildfire frequency.
Accomplishments Through 2007
A cluster analysis was conducted using Mesonet data from
November 1993 to February 1999 which identified eight wind field
clusters. These were further refined by taking all data available
from November 1993 to March 2006 and assigning them to clusters
and refining the cluster centers. The clusters are numbered from
1 to 8, with 1 being the most common and 8 the least common. A
number of statistics for each cluster were calculated including
frequency of occurrence by season and time of day, average
duration, times when each cluster was most likely to be
observed, and the probability of transitions from one cluster to
another. The evolution of the clusters has also been studied. A
number of software tools have been developed that allow
forecasters to examine current and historical wind fields in the
context of which cluster they belong to and the expected changes
in cluster membership over time.
Results
A detailed description of each cluster is beyond the scope of
this report. As an example, Figure 9-11 shows the INL Site wind
fields representing clusters 1 and 3. The left map shows the most
frequent pattern at INL Site, namely a nocturnal drainage flow
from the northeast. It is most common during summer nights and
early mornings. The right map shows cluster 3, the third most
frequent pattern representing moderate up-valley flow. It is
often observed during summer afternoons. Overall, the first 5
clusters are more common and are related to normal diurnal
trends due to terrain and atmospheric stability conditions.
Clusters 6-8 occur less frequently and are associated with
large-scale forcing from passing weather systems. People working
at INL Site may be somewhat surprised that strong southwest
winds are not the most common pattern. However, it must be
remembered that most INL Site workers are at the site only
during daylight hours, whereas the cluster analysis is based on
data from all hours. Also, people usually remember extreme
weather events more than the intervening quiescent periods. A
more in-depth description of the cluster analysis is found in
Clawson et al. (2007).
Plans for Continuation
We plan to continue improving our understanding of the
physical processes, such as terrain effects, related to each
wind cluster. We also plan to improve the cluster forecasting
tools. This will allow us to incorporate the clusters into daily
forecasting and also to work with the Pocatello National Weather
Service in improving short term wind forecasting across SE Idaho
and the INL Site.
Eventually we would like to look at whether the clusters are
correlated with other spatial factors including precipitation
and vegetation distributions and wildfi re probability.
Investigators and Affiliations
Roger Carter, Physical Scientist, NOAA
Air Resources Laboratory Field Research Division, Idaho Falls, Idaho
Jason D. Rich and Neil Hukari, Research
Meteorologists, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Field Research
Division, Idaho Falls, Idaho
Funding
Sources
U.S.
Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office
References
Clawson, K.
L., R. M. Eckman, N. F. Hukari, J. D. Rich, N. R. Ricks, 2007:
Climatography of the Idaho National Laboratory 3rd Edition, NOAA
Technical Memorandum OAR ARL-259, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 249 pp.