Improving
Rangeland Monitoring and Assessment: Integrating Remote Sensing,
GIS, and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems
Accomplishments
This research was conducted as part of a doctoral program and
has been completed
Dissertation Abstract
Creeping environmental changes are impacting some of the
largest remaining intact parcels of sagebrush steppe ecosystems
in the western United States, creating major problems for land
managers. The INL Site, located in southeastern Idaho, is part
of the sagebrush steppe ecosystem, one of the largest ecosystems
on the continent. Scientists at the INL Site and the University
of Idaho have integrated existing field and remotely sensed data
with geographic information systems technology to analyze how
recent fires on the INL Site have influenced the current
distribution of terrestrial vegetation. Three vegetation mapping
and classification systems were used to evaluate the changes in
vegetation caused by fires between 1994 and 2003. Approximately
24 percent of the sagebrush steppe community on the INL Site was
altered by fire, mostly over a 5-year period. There were notable
differences between methods, especially for juniper woodland and
grasslands. The Anderson system (Anderson et al. 1996) was
superior for representing the landscape because it includes
playa/bare ground/disturbed area and sagebrush steppe on lava as
vegetation categories. This study found that assessing existing
data sets is useful for quantifying fire impacts and should be
helpful in future fire and land use planning. The evaluation
identified that data from remote sensing technologies is not
currently of sufficient quality to assess the percentage of
cover. To fill this need, an approach was designed using both
helicopter and fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and
image processing software to evaluate six cover types on field
plots located on the INL Site. The helicopter UAV provided the
best system compared against field sampling, but is more
dangerous and has spatial coverage limitations. It was
reasonably accurate for dead shrubs and was very good in
assessing percentage of bare ground, litter and grasses;
accuracy for litter and shrubs is questionable. The fixed wing
system proved to be feasible and can collect imagery for very
large areas in a short period of time. It was accurate for bare
ground and grasses. Both UAV systems have limitations, but these
will be reduced as the technology advances. In both cases, the
UAV systems collected data at a much faster rate than possible
on the ground. The study concluded that improvements in
automating the image processing efforts would greatly improve
use of the technology. In the near future, UAV technology may
revolutionize rangeland monitoring in the same way GPS have
affected navigation while conducting field activities.
Investigators and Affiliations
Robert P. Breckenridge,
Manager and Graduate Student, Environmental Stewardship and
Water Management Department, BEA, Idaho Falls, Idaho, and
Environmental Science Department University of Idaho, Moscow,
Idaho
Maxine Dakins, Associate
Professor, Environmental Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow,
Idaho
Steven Bunting, Professor,
Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management, University of
Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
Lee Vierling, Associate
Professor, Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management,
University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
Jerry Harbour, Manager,
National Training Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Funding Sources
United States
Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office
References
Anderson, J.E., K.T. Ruppel, J.M.
Glennon, K.E. Holte and R.C. Rope. 1996. Plant Communities,
Ethnoecology, and Flora of the Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory. Environmental Surveillance, Education, and Research
Report, ESRF-005.